logo

Brokers Offering Both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5

These brokers run MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 side by side. Because the two use incompatible programming languages, having both is what makes an unhurried migration possible rather than a hard switch.

RoboForex logo

RoboForex

RoboForex는 낮은 최소 예치금, ECN 및 센트 계좌, CopyFX 카피 트레이딩, 이슬람 계좌, 그리고 다양한 거래 상품을 제공합니다.

신뢰도 점수
10/10
법적 절차 간편성
9/10
최소 입금액
0
Dukascopy logo

Dukascopy

스위스 FINMA 규제 은행-브로커로 JForex 및 MT4 거래, PAMM 및 카피 트레이딩 서비스, 100달러 최소 예치금으로 500개 이상의 상품 제공.

신뢰도 점수
8/10
법적 절차 간편성
4/10
최소 입금액
100
Interactive Brokers logo

Interactive Brokers

CFTC, FCA, ASIC 등 최고 수준 규제 기관의 규제를 받는 미국 증권사로, 최소 예치금 없이 외환, 주식, 옵션, 선물, ETF를 제공합니다.

신뢰도 점수
8/10
법적 절차 간편성
1/10
최소 입금액
0
FXOpen logo

FXOpen

FXOpen은 최소 $1 예치금, PAMM 투자 계좌, 이슬람 계좌, 전화 거래 지원 및 다양한 거래 가능 상품을 제공하는 다중 규제 ECN 브로커입니다.

신뢰도 점수
7/10
법적 절차 간편성
6/10
최소 입금액
1
Fxview logo

Fxview

Fxview는 원시 ECN 가격, 최소 5달러 예금, MT4, MT5 및 ActTrader 전반에 걸친 스캘핑 친화적인 거래를 제공하는 키프로스 기반 외환 및 CFD 브로커입니다.

신뢰도 점수
6/10
법적 절차 간편성
7/10
최소 입금액
5
ICM Capital logo

ICM Capital

ICM Capital은 최소 예치금 없이 MT4, MT5, cTrader를 제공하고, ECN 스타일 가격 책정 및 이슬람 스왑 프리 계좌를 제공하는 런던 기반의 외환 및 CFD 브로커입니다.

신뢰도 점수
7/10
법적 절차 간편성
4/10
최소 입금액
0
ThinkMarkets logo

ThinkMarkets

ThinkMarkets는 MT4, MT5, ThinkTrader와 PAMM, 카피 트레이딩, 이슬람 계좌를 제공하는 다중 규제 외환 및 CFD 브로커로, 스탠다드 계좌에는 최소 예치금이 없습니다.

신뢰도 점수
6/10
법적 절차 간편성
6/10
최소 입금액
0
OANDA logo

OANDA

OANDA는 최소 예치금 없이 다중 규제를 받는 외환 및 CFD 브로커로, MT4와 자체 데스크톱, 웹, 모바일 플랫폼, 분리된 고객 자금, 이슬람 계좌 옵션을 제공합니다.

신뢰도 점수
8/10
법적 절차 간편성
1/10
최소 입금액
0
Forex.com logo

Forex.com

Forex.com은 FCA, ASIC, CFTC/NFA, IIROC, FSA 및 CIMA의 규제를 받는 StoneX 소유 브로커로, 최소 $100의 예금으로 MT4, DMA 및 자체 플랫폼 계정을 제공합니다.

신뢰도 점수
9/10
법적 절차 간편성
2/10
최소 입금액
100
AvaTrade logo

AvaTrade

AvaTrade는 카피 트레이딩, 이슬람 계좌, 분리된 자금을 제공하는 글로벌 규제 외환 및 CFD 브로커로, 무료 세미나와 일일 시장 분석을 지원합니다.

신뢰도 점수
5/10
법적 절차 간편성
5/10
최소 입금액
100

Why running both is a real feature

MetaTrader 5 is not an upgrade of MetaTrader 4. It is a separate platform with a different programming language, and MQL4 code does not compile on it. A trader whose method depends on a specific expert advisor or indicator written for MT4 does not have a platform choice at all until that tool is rewritten.

A broker running both turns that from a decision into a process. The MT4 robot keeps trading while the MT5 version is built and tested, on the same client relationship, with funds moving internally between the two accounts.

What actually differs between the two

  • Language. MQL4 and MQL5 are incompatible. This is the whole reason both platforms persist.
  • Strategy tester. MT5 tests multi-threaded and across several instruments at once; MT4 is single-threaded on one symbol. For parameter optimisation over long histories the difference is hours against days.
  • Timeframes and order types. MT5 offers twenty-one timeframes against nine, and a wider set of pending orders.
  • Depth of market. Present in MT5 where the broker populates it, absent from MT4 entirely.
  • Position accounting. MT5 supports netting as well as hedging; the broker chooses per account type, and traders arriving from MT4 sometimes find hedging unavailable.

What to check when a broker offers both

Offering two platforms is not the same as offering them on equal terms.

  • Is the pricing identical? Brokers frequently price the two differently, and the cheaper platform is not always the newer one.
  • Is the instrument list identical? MT5 builds often carry more instruments, particularly equities and indices. If the instruments you trade exist on only one, the choice is made for you.
  • Is the MT5 account netting or hedging? Grid, recovery and any method holding opposing positions in one instrument require hedging. This is set by the broker per account type.
  • Is depth of market enabled on MT5? The window exists on every build; whether it shows anything depends on the broker feeding it.
  • Are both accounts under one client profile? They usually are, which means one verification and internal transfers rather than a funding round trip.

Planning a migration

The sequence that works, for a trader with automation to move:

  • Open the MT5 account alongside the MT4 one and fund it minimally.
  • Rebuild the tool in MQL5 rather than attempting a mechanical translation — the event models differ enough that a line-by-line port produces subtle behavioural differences.
  • Run the MT5 version on a demo against the live MT4 version on the same instrument, and compare trade for trade.
  • Move a fraction of the size to MT5 and run both live for a period.
  • Only then retire the MT4 version.

The parallel-run step is what catches the differences that testing does not, and it is only possible because both platforms exist at the same broker.

If you do not automate

For a discretionary trader placing manual orders on major pairs, the two platforms are close enough that the choice barely registers. Pick on the pricing and the instrument list, use the one with the timeframes your method needs, and treat the second as a spare rather than a decision to agonise over.

Frequently asked questions

  • Can I run my MT4 expert advisor on MT5?

    No. MQL4 and MQL5 are different languages and the code will not compile. The tool must be rewritten, or an MT5 version obtained from its author.

  • Do MT4 and MT5 accounts share a balance?

    Usually not. They are separate trading accounts under one client profile, with funds moved internally. One verification covers both.

  • Which platform has better execution?

    Neither. Execution depends on the account, the broker's liquidity and its policy — not on the terminal. Differences traders attribute to the platform are usually differences between account types.

  • Why do brokers still offer MT4?

    A large body of retail automation was written for it and never ported. MetaQuotes also stopped issuing new MT4 licences, so the brokers offering it are those that already held one.

브로커 가이드